Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Cyrus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 08:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Katie Cyrus

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Sending to AfD as PROD appears contested on talk page of article. Basically, fails the notability criteria, and since notability is not inherited, her only claim to fame is somewhat unnoteworthy. &lowast; \ / (⁂) 05:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete At the very least she should have a IMDb page based on her credits, but she doesn't, and I don't find any real G-hits to speak of.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 07:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. The case seems crystal clear. There's WP:ITSA: "Family members of celebrities also must meet Wikipedia's notability criteria on their own merits". But the subject easily fails WP:ENTERTAINER, because she hasn't had a single significant role. I was unable to find even a source that verifies any of the minor roles, which leads me to conclude that she also fails the criteria of the general notability guideline. decltype (talk) 09:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as totally unverifiable. Since the Miley Cyrus article doesn't mention her, I don't see the need to redirect. - Mgm|(talk) 11:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability isn't inherited and minor roles don't constitute notability. Computerjoe 's talk 22:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above, notability isn't inherited. — Ledgend  Gamer  23:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails notability criterion. Hekerui (talk) 02:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no real notability asserted. J I P  | Talk 12:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.