Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Johnson (actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 13:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Katie Johnson (actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not demonstrate notbility. She has modeled for 2 photographers and stared in short film/advert for 1 of those photographers. Article created by user Katiejhnsn, which appears to be the subject of the article herself. Article doesn't appear to have ever had 'New unreviewed article' or similar template. Lopifalko (talk) 12:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. On notability, I currently have no opinion. &para; I'm not aware that it's necessary to add Template:New unreviewed article to a new, unreviewed article. I've created a fair number of articles but have never added it, and indeed have only rarely seen it used by others. &para; Even if the article was/is autobiographical, autobiography is not among the reasons for deletion. -- Hoary (talk) 13:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Regarding Template:New unreviewed article, sorry, my mistake, I thought all new articles had to begin with a 'This page is a new unreviewed article....' status. Perhaps I'm confusing my templates. -Lopifalko (talk)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 09:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.