Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Pilbeam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Katie Pilbeam

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG. The two sources in the article appear to be biographies put out by her employers. An online search for sources that cover her turns up no significant coverage by independent reliable sources, so I move that this article be deleted as being written about a non-notable subject. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC) Delete I agree with the nominator, the first sources provided are Not Reliable. -- VViking Talk Edits 13:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Journalism, Russia, Switzerland,  and England. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.