Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Quinn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Katie Quinn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This individual is a British actress who does not seem to meet WP:GNG. She seems to be a different person from the American journalist and video host. I could only find mention of her in social media. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 15:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 15:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 15:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete -- does not meet WP:NACTOR and significant RS coverage not found. WP:TOOSOON. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete -- actress of little note, nothing worthy of WP in her resume. Jefstevens (talk) 06:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - she has been interviewed in UK Film Review and has won a best actress award. (Side note: there appears to be a third Katie Quinn born in UK circa 1993 http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6093944/).Jonpatterns (talk) 08:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: No coverage found on net on independent reliable source - fails WP:NACTOR. award is only on primary source. Maybe WP:TOOSOON. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 11:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.