Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Rotolo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 20:03, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Katie Rotolo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article appears to have been created for promotional purposes (recently appeared in...), and/or to try to establish the person's notability. While apparently she's on IMDB, that doesn't make someone notable. Also, there appears to be a conflict of interest, given the user name and the user account having only this contribution. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 14:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * delete - seems promotional and probably WP:COI as the nom states. Also, many of her supposed credits are not in IMDB. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)


 * interesting point. if you go to the vimeo link you can watch the Lies credit. It's a short film and as a filmmaker I know things like that often don't exist on IMDb. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JRomeoT (talk • contribs) 14:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Appears to fail WP:PEOPLE; can not find any significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources, except for the IMDB listing which is not sufficient by itself. Davnor (talk) 14:49, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 01:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per too soon. While yes, she exists, her career fails ENT, and her coverage fails GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:02, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - zero evidence of notability from even remotely reliable sources. She may be a fine young actor, but she's not yet notable and has had no notable roles.  The IMBD link is a dead one. Bearian (talk) 20:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)  P.S. A Google search here revealed almost nothing useful or reliable. Bearian (talk) 20:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. Edward321 (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.