Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Rowley Jones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Katie Rowley Jones

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Questionable notability, tagged since November. Only sources found were trivial or primary. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I did some minor searching and found a Hollywood Reporter review which singles this performer out. There's almost certain to be more. MAjor theatrical productions - especially musicals - are heavily reviewed. Evalpor (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 06:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 06:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added reliable sources to the article and verified the notability of the subject. Ciao! Silver  seren C 06:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I clicked Google news search at the top of the AFD, and I see articles talking about her straight away.   D r e a m Focus  00:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and further improve. Notable stage actress whose performances are well received and reviewed in multiple reliable sources over a nearly 10-year period.  Come'on nominator... how could you have missed 'em?    Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.