Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Vick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wizardman 01:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Katie Vick

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a fictional, unseen character in a professional wrestling storyline. The story arc did not last very long and neither the character nor the storyline had any ramifications even within the professional wrestling world. Article is uncited and the subject is not notable. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I'm not very familiar with professional wrestling, but this article doesn't seem to stand on its own. -- Irixman (t) (m) 23:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong delete per nom. --Evb-wiki 00:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of significant coverage from independent sources Corpx 06:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Kane. I am surprised that this doesn't have many significant coverage as I remember this causing considerable outrage at the time due to it's tasteless execution (such as necrophilia can be covered in a tasteful manner). This should be merged as it was a very notable event (as a low point) in the history of the character Kane Irishjp 12:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - The storyline is already mentioned in Glen Jacobs. That should suffice. --Jtalledo (talk) 17:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Not in this detail with reference to the real world reactions Irishjp 09:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The thing is, we need not go into so much detail about this subject. A short phrase describing the storyline as "ill received" or "controversial" or something along those lines would suffice in the Glen Jacobs article. I don't think large amounts of text need to be merged from the Katie Vick article to that one. --Jtalledo (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DaveApter 13:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.