Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katina Stefanova (investor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Katina Stefanova (investor)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

utterly non-notable CEO - no idea if the company is notable but she is not on her own - most sources are just passing mentions, co-written by Stefanova or press releases/interviews. Also worth noting this was previously created as Katina Stefanova by an undisclosed paid editor and subsequently salted by. CUPIDICAE💕 20:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Women,  and Bulgaria.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the significant coverage is of Marto Capital, although one of the sources cited spends quite a few words investigating Stefanova's claimed résumé, none of which is mentioned in the article. Almost all biographical details are cited to WP:ABOUTSELF information (and a weird blog that only seems to host one glowing article about Stefanova). I didn't find any reliable sources with significant coverage that weren't already cited in the article, and I don't find those sufficient to support WP:BASIC. Schazjmd   (talk)  21:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Send to draft to work on. Kathyspikes (talk) 22:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note. Kathyspikes is the creator of the article. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC).


 * Delete, non-notable per the sourcing as detailed above. Also, I don't see why it would need draftifying, when Draft:Katina Stefanova already exists. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC).
 * Delete per all of the above. Way below the line for WP:GNG and I can't really fathom what she is supposed to be notable FOR? The question usually is "does notability stack up?" here it seems to be "What is the notability?"  Velella  Velella Talk 21:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete — non notable individual who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore, this is something very advanced anti spam editors like already know, but for those not familiar with the laughable antics of Spam/UPE, editors, this gimmick, & this one too, are intentional gaslighting maneuvers intended to put Praxi or any editor querying their dubious edits on the defensive but unfortunately for them this isn’t Praxi's first rodeo. Furthermore @ no! nobody is draftyfing a non notable paid job. Furthermore this edit is disingenuous and borders on outrightly being mendacious as you are the article creator. Celestina007 (talk) 23:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: The subject's prior job at Bridgewater does was not inherently notable, nor does the subsequent coverage of Marto Capital's gyrations confer biographical notability of any individual there. (The previous SALTing of the obvious article title should really be considered as extending to any bracketed titles that might be appended in further instances such as this.) AllyD (talk) 08:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comments. I was unable to find content that meets WP:SIGCOV. Heartmusic678 (talk) 11:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.