Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katniss vs Peeta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Katniss vs Peeta

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't think we need the book's subplots to have their own Wiki page. Plus, this wiki page is a train wreck. JoelWhy (talk) 14:43, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong delete: no indication of notability (as independent from the book as a whole) per nom. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 14:47, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Plot-only summary of a work of fiction with no indication of how this subject is independently notable. I might have suggested a redirect to The Hunger Games trilogy but it seems like a stretch to think that this title is a plausible search term. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:54, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not encyclopedic, as written it is original research. --TeaDrinker (talk) 22:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.