Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katrina del Mar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. The majority of opinion here is that the subject has received sufficient coverage to be considered notable, and evidence has been presented to back this up. Michig (talk) 13:55, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Katrina del Mar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fancruft, "references" self-published, previously deleted G8 Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:15, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 22:29, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. I found one good source (Huffington Post) and 3 marginal sources .  Seems legit. --Cerebellum (talk) 01:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:10, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - The article appears to be somewhat of an ad and the real notability is questionable. I made a few changes to the most objectionable issues, but much work is needed for this to be acceptable.--Rpclod (talk) 05:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's plenty of significant coverage of Katrina del Mar to be found. Articles about her in reliable sources such as Photograph magazine, Musee magazine, Papermag, Posture Mag, and HuffPo demonstrate that the subject meets WP:BIO. gobonobo  + c 00:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 20.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 04:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Several in-depth sources, nontrivial, independent, reliable, meets GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:28, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.