Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katy Garretson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  So Why  16:41, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Katy Garretson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a television director and producer. While there are claims here that would probably satisfy WP:CREATIVE if they were properly sourced, nothing here hands her an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of legitimate sourcing for it -- but the only references present here are a genealogy page for her birthdate (which has been getting editwarred over, to boot), her own LinkedIn, and her own deadlinked "staff" profile on the website of an organization she's been directly involved with. And the article has been flagged as needing better references since 2010, to boot. I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with access to sources I don't have can properly reference this up to a keepable standard, but nothing here entitles her to indefinitely keep an article that's parked entirely on primary sources. Bearcat (talk) 00:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:57, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:57, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  The   Magnificentist  15:27, 5 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - most of the content looks okay, just needs a few sources. Won and nominated for several important awards, key person on many popular (notable) shows. I've added some RS and will add more. Keep the "baby". (And this "baby" was flagged in 2009) — Preceding unsigned comment added by StrayBolt (talk • contribs) 17:49, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Frank Capra award is a big deal. Bearian (talk) 13:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 20:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Draftify or delete. Unless I'm missing something, all the sources, including what added, are either connected to the subject, unreliable (local coverage, blogs, etc.), or mere passing mentions. If I did miss something, please hit up my talk page and I'll reconsider, as I hate to see articles go which seem like they should be notable. — GrammarFascist   contribs talk 02:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. It should be Keep from WP:CREATIVE #3 for just her directing work for many episodes and seasons on Fraiser, a show in the top ten (almost) every season. Yes, I know the DGA is not a reliable source for the DGA awards, and also because she is a director, she is a member of DGA and another reason not to trust that source. Time to take a break and watch another Garage Sale Mystery. StrayBolt (talk) 05:41, 20 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.