Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katy Gordon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. MuZemike 21:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Katy Gordon

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

I beleive copious precedent has shown that parliamentary candidates are not notable for that reason alone. Subject has no other claim to other than local notability. Web results are limited to Liberal Democrats sites and blogs. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 16:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per copious precedent. --Mais oui! (talk) 19:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  —Mais oui! (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - feel free to nominate both Osama Saeed and Anas Sarwar - see Glasgow Central (UK Parliament constituency) - on exactly the same grounds. --Mais oui! (talk) 19:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Anas Sarwar has already been nominated for deletion and was closed as keep. Feel free to renominate, but there were reasons for making him an exception. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to Glasgow North. There are some circumstances when it's worth having an article on a PPC, but not one that looks like a reprint of the candidate's own website. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Chris Neville-Smith. Article is sourced entirely from the subjects own website, and a blog. It is full of weasel words, and far from neutral. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 21:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.