Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katzenjammer Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Katzenjammer Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  09:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  09:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  09:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. This article has been changed little in six years. It was tagged with a CSD A7 18 minutes after it was created, but it was removed, though I'm not clear on why(and the user who did it is now blocked). Does not seem to meet WP:ORG.  My search could not find sources(only other entities with "Katzenjammer" in the name came up). 331dot (talk) 11:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:COMPANY and pretty much every other criterion (WP:ORGCRIT, etc.) for company notability. Non-notable local record label with about four non-notable bands on its roster (two of which feature a member of the band that founded the label) – it hasn't even released a single record since 2010, a fact made obvious by its own social media websites, which for the past few years have mostly consisted of posts promoting shows by other artists and digging up past interviews and promotions for its former record releases. The link in the article for the band "Dissymmetry" directs to an unrelated article about chemistry. Richard3120 (talk) 12:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - superior analysis by Richard3120 and 331dot. Non-notable label.  No length of history, no roster of notable artists, no indication the label made any impact on musical culture.  Aside from what makes record labels notable, fails WP:GNG.    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 13:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.