Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kauffman Vodka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. KTC (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Kauffman Vodka

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

advertising The Banner talk 07:38, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I have added various newspaper references. There are these plus various other media items which include this firm's vodka in lists of extremely expensive high-end gifts etc. In sum, I think there is enough to make an argument that it is a notable niche firm. AllyD (talk) 10:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:28, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 13 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 21 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep because of the references added by . Although I think that this product is a ridiculously overpriced indulgence, and the notion of adding a vintage to neutral spirits is absurd, it seem that this is a notable absurdity.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  02:50, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.