Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaura clan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Closing in favor of a renomination of individual or small groups of articles that are closely related. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Kaura clan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All the pages listed below belong to Category:Jat clans, or its subcategories. All these pages lack the very basic notability guidelines. Fail WP:GNG. They must discussed and deleted per WP:NOT. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following articles:

The above listed articles hardy have any references or citations. Most of them don't have any and the remainder sustain with one or two. There are many other articles in the above mentioned category which need to be AfDed. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment Please, no. While grouped deletion discussions are sometimes handy, this is over the top. There is no way that I can check for sources for this lot in the usual seven-day period that is allowed at AfD. Bear in mind also that some of these probably can be redirected and some probably can be converted into surname lists, we're looking at an extremely messy discussion. Bin this filing and nominate, say, 3 or 4 per week. That's more than enough to deal with. - Sitush (talk) 13:34, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment It might be more work in the short term, but please withdraw this and nominate the articles separately, as Sitush suggests, at a slower rate. There is no WP:DEADLINE. A discussion this large is going to go exactly nowhere. Vanamonde (talk) 13:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.