Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaustubha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Non-admin closure Speedy keep per WP:Speedy keep 1.2.5 "nominations which are so erroneous that they indicate that the nominator has not even read the article in question"  As pointed out by User:Mrschimpf, this article is not about a person. There is no libel, defamation, or nonsense in the article as suggested by nom. v/r - TP 13:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Kaustubha

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Defamation, Libel, Nonsense Markdoe (talk) 01:29, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep Article is about a object in Hinduism, not a person, so nominator's accusations above are invalid. Please restate a proper reason for nomination of this article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. The article is in terrible shape, but Google results in enough notable hits, IMO.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 03:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep An important religious concept in Hinduism. It was described as the "wishing-stone of narratives" in Bibliotheca Indica, published in 1899 by the Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal.  Many other reliable soures describe this element of Hindu mythology. Cullen328 (talk) 04:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Erpert. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 11:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.