Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kautilya Pandit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. j⚛e deckertalk 01:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Kautilya Pandit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet notability requirements (WP:BIO, WP:GNG). The first reference (indoscopy) doesn't look like a mainstream published source and many not be RS. The second is OK, but I don't think it's enough. Searching doesn't show anything else much, apart from copies of the same 1-off comment piece. Also I think WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE should err on the side of caution when it comes to children. 2.123.67.6 (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * comment completing nomination for IP user. Mangoe (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Please Google his name! He is considered genius my Indian media as compared to his age! Shobhit Gosain  Talk 07:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 12:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete People are not notable for just being precocious.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 11:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 *Delete I've removed the "first source" mentioned above because it was Blogger-hosted content. Worse, it was merely repeating what the news sources said. Worse still, the news sources are merely repeating what each other say, almost akin to a press release (although one does say his IQ might be 150 whereas another says it might be 130). The family are seeking donations and that seems to be the impetus behind all this. If he really is a notable child prodigy then he'll do something notable over an extended period of time, not just as a one-day news effort. The article can always be recreated if that is shown at some point in the future. Having a Wikipedia article on a 5-year old one-hit wonder is a lot of pressure to put on a kid. So, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:GNG, WP:PROMO, WP:RS ... I could go on. - Sitush (talk) 12:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 
 * Keep - changed from delete to keep. I'm weak on it but take on board the comments below. - Sitush (talk) 03:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep His "memory power" has made him well known in North India and his interaction with film actor Amitabh Bachchan in KBC show has made him popular, but after that first burst of activities, the boy seems become silent. Now, the article is re-organised, less puffery and with due respects to User:Sitush, problems about WP:RS,WP:Promo are now attended. But it may not pass WP:NOTNEWS and even then I feel the topic/article merits a weak keep. And of course, it may put pressure on the boy, which pressure he already sustained with numerous TV shows aired in India, just to display his "memory power"! - Rayabhari (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 22:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The newly added sources seem to meet RS and GNG. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Addendum to my last comment. The article still needs a lot of work and I think is still way too promotional. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - The subject meets WP:BASIC. Source examples include:
 * Hindustan Times
 * The Tribune
 * Zee News (Video)
 * The Hindu (Short article, but entirely about the subject)
 * The Times of India (Short article, but entirely about the subject)
 * – NorthAmerica1000 06:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.