Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kavalsky (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Kavalsky
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Kept by no consensus at AfD in 2012 (2 arguments for redirect, 2 for delete, none for a straight keep). I've not found any sources which indicate that Kavalsky is actually a variation of "Kowalski", so redirecting in my opinion is not suitable. Not suitable for use as a disambig either as there are no article titles containing "Kavalsky". &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, though Wikipedia has an extraordinarily low bar for articles about surnames (or lists of people with particular surnames), this one has no sources, seems to be based on guesswork/speculation, neither are there any notable Kavalskys with articles on any Wikipedia that I can see. Sionk (talk) 19:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, lacks sources to establish WP:GNG. MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:GNG. Searching Google, Google Books, Google Scholar, Google News, Google News Archive, Newspapers.com, and the Internet Archive basically only confirms that WP:ITEXISTS. The only name that came up multiple times was a Basil G. Kavalsky. I agree there is no reason for a redirect or disambig. TipsyElephant (talk) 21:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.