Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kavana Sarma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. as I think a 3rd relisting would not bring forward any futher comments. Liz Read! Talk! 21:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Kavana Sarma

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors,  and India. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: Does not appear to pass WP:NACADEMIC. Properly assessing against WP:NAUTHOR would need Telugu news/literary sources. The te-wiki version of this article is not promising, and nor is a search for the Telugu versions of his name and pen-names. On the other hand, there are two reviews in the national The Hindu newspaper which are linked from his site, and neither of these reviews are visible from a search -- even directly on the site. Given that he has been writing since the 1970s and online coverage is obviously deficient, a weak keep on NAUTHOR#3 grounds based on the visible reviews plus the selection of his work for translation (see ). ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 10:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete since subject fails both GNG and WP:ACADEMIC, as the above contribution by Hydronium Hydroxide also relates. -The Gnome (talk) 17:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.