Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaveri Crater


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Kaveri.  Sandstein  09:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Kaveri Crater

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not seeing how this passes the WP:GNG. It has so far only received coverage in one 2017 paper than has zero citations, and 2019 article in The Hindu. No prejudice against later recreation if this later gets more substantial coverage. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of any traction in the geology community. The reports of breccias are suggestive, but in the absence of further corroborating findings, this does not merit its own article. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 00:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Merge or delete? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Selective merge to Kaveri as a mention of the basin. Agree with the lack of coverage on this topic despite the very well-written article; however, the 2017 paper seems definitive enough to mention as a scientific finding related to the Kaveri river basin. Caleb Stanford (talk) 05:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge to Kaveri river. As mentioned above, there is a decent article on it so a merge makes sense. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 01:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.