Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kavya Thapar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Kavya Thapar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This actress has starred in two films, which is not multiple. Also, as a model, she has not won any awards, so she is not a notable model. This is WP:Too soon until more of her films release. TamilMirchi (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Commnet 2 is "multiple" -- The SandDoctor Talk 04:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG ChunnuBhai (talk) 05:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Nominator has been indef-blocked per WP:UPE, see user's talk page for further discussion of the matter. --Finngall talk  15:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment 2018 is too soon? wow. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:09, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep She has done multiple notable films to pass WP:NACTOR. - The9Man  ( Talk ) 10:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The SandDoctor  Talk 07:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep it appears GNG and NACTOR are met; with the paid editing issues this probably should have been procedurally closed. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.