Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayaking in India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Consensus is that sufficient sourcing exists, and thanks to NA1000 for taking the extra step of adding some to the article. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Kayaking in India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article shows no independent notability from the kayaking main article. &mdash;George8211 / T 19:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  19:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  19:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete : No sources, no region specific new information. Coderzombie (talk) 06:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Kayaking facilities are available at Indian Institute of Management-Calcutta . A kayaking workshop in Hyderabad was declared "a hit" by The Times of India. Several kayaking competitions are also organised; Malabar River Festival, National Championship of Kayaking & Canoeing, All India Inter-University Kayaking, Canoeing championship etc. The Sports Authority of India also provides kayaking facilities and there's Kayaking and Canoeing Association of India . Indian kayaking and canoeing team participated in the 2010 and 2014 Asian Games. More than 100 companies offer kayaking facilities in the Ganga white waters.--Skr15081997 (talk) 15:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve – The topic passes WP:N. Source examples include:, , , , , , , , (more reliable sources exist). Note that per WP:NRVE, topic notability is based upon available sources, rather than the state of sources in Wikipedia articles. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -If notability is a concern here, then I think it has been addressed by and . I'm wondering if  would like to further expand their deletion rationale or just withdraw? WP:NOTCLEANUP may be an interesting reading here.  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  21:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I think that this may now be addressed by a search for RS, which I should have done before nominating. &mdash;George8211 / T 10:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.