Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayandee, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:08, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Kayandee, California

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm not seeing a way WP:GEOLAND is met here. Topos show a rail junction within Bakersfield itself. Newspapers.com has five hits for Kayandee, none of which are in California. Can only get the mostly useless snippet view for all of the Gbooks references, but they all appear to be either passing mentions in railroad materials or lists of place names. In addition to GEOLAND, WP:GNG does not seem to be met either. Hog Farm Bacon 06:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 06:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 06:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I love how these non-places create whole communities on the Web... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 13:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * delete On top of everything else, this classic railroad place name doesn't appear on the topos until well after the area has been overrun by urbanization. Mangoe (talk) 14:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NGEO.  // Timothy ::  talk  17:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.