Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaydex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Kaydex

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable artiste described as "upcoming", "fast rising", etc in press release. A Google search gave news on release of music video, sponsored press releases and one article talking about his wealth. Nothing to suggest pass of WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO Darreg (talk) 10:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  11:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  11:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  11:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: non-notable subject who fails WP:ANYBIO. Article creator is a suspected sock of and  with similar style of article creation (draft then move to mainspace). —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 12:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree with your suspicion. Its not so much about the socking, I am more concerned that we likely have an editor continuously socking to create articles for non-notable upcoming Nigerian musicians. This is likely a case of paid editing, because I don't understand the motivation for contributing to nn upcoming artistes. I will be on the watch-out henceforth. Darreg (talk) 20:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: subject of article does not satisfy nor qualify for a stand-alone article on the encylopedia as the subject of the article fails primary notabiliy guidelines and policies. Example : WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO and furthermore;, to add to your thesis, it is my understanding that of recent most individuals have started to realize that creating pages for others or themselves is relatively easy, and not as "hard" nor is it a prerogative of only staffs employed at Wikipedia as erroneously believed in times past, hence the hike we all are currently experiencing as regards the creation of pages of non-notable persons. it would get worse as this knowledge becomes more widely known. Celestina007 (talk) 11:27, 03 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thesis :)? I thought its only Phd holders that write thesis, point understood though! 11:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Darreg (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.