Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayla Uddenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Kayla Uddenberg

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football,  and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. RedPatch (talk) 02:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. pburka (talk) 16:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:20, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - there are a few sources there that focus on her (usually with her sisters as a trio rather than individually though) beyond just routine match coverage. Youngest player to ever play for her senior national team (age 13) is not an non-notable fact though and there's just enough prose, so I feel it hits that minimum needed. RedPatch (talk) 21:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 03:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per . Clearly significant figure in Saint Kitts and Nevis women's and international football. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep seems to pass GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:27, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.