Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakh campaigns of 1843–1844


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 20:47, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Kazakh campaigns of 1843–1844

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As I mentioned earlier, the event in science is not distinguished in any way, the uprising is not divided into such a period of time, the date is invented. The article was created in order to have the column "Kazakh victory" in the infobox Kazman322 (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting to get second opinions on the Redirect suggestion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Kazman322 (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Kazakhstan,  and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 20:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kenesary's rebellion. Unlike the creator's other articles Bekhmakhanov is quoted accurately with the source not distorted. However, Bekhmakhanov doesn't have a name for these events, and Abdirov's winter campaign phrasing does not refer to the 1843-1844 events. Kges1901 (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Even the redirect should not be imo, because this term does not exist anywhere at all. Kazman322 (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I have options like "Russian campaigns against Kenesary Khan" and "Russian campaigns against the Kazakh Khanate" of 1843-1844. Batyikhan 4-5 (talk) 04:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - A Redir implies that there is someone, somewhere, who will search for this term. I agree with that the term itself is unattested and thus unlikely to ever be a search string. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.