Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakhfilm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and no calls for deletion outside of the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:44, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Kazakhfilm

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:GNG, no reliable sources (only its own website and IMDB). Specs112  t   c  15:25, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, it is surely notable. After performing a quick search, I see some good souurces: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, though some sources are not in English. Dipankan  ( Have a chat? ) 15:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dipankan001. A national film studio with a long history, GNews, GBooks show many potential sources. More examples:  Note that the Russian and Spanish Wikipedia article has a lot more detail (and even a couple of sources) that could be helpful here. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 18:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 18:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 18:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Although sources (at least ones in English) are hard to find at first, it appears that this is a major film studio within Kazakhstan. Think of it as a Kazakh Universal if you like. Notability clearly established. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:45, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.