Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakhstan–Serbia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Ixfd64 (talk) 02:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Kazakhstan–Serbia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. non resident ambassadors, no bilateral agreements. just some mainly 1 way trade from Kazakhstan. LibStar (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - random indeed, with no evidence of notability apparent. - Biruitorul Talk 15:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is seriously another random combination. None of this article is sourced, and it fails WP:N. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N and not a directory. Foreign relations of the 203 sovereign countries are best discussed in the article about the country, or a standalone article if a major country, rather than in 20,000 such binary stubs. A link to the country's foreign ministry website will provide more up-to-date info than a robostub created and neglected. Edison (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: WikiProject International relations has some well thought out advice (see WikiProject International relations) for when bilateral relations between two nations are notable. This article does not even assert to meet any of them. This sort of material should just be covered in the articles of each nation if it is even notable enough to do so.Locke9k (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete there are barely, if any, relations between these two countries. Tavix | Talk  21:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  16:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.