Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakhstan Student Society in the United Kingdom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I can't think of an appropriate Borat joke, sadly.  Sandstein  19:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Kazakhstan Student Society in the United Kingdom

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This reads like an advertisement and does not appear to meet the guidelines of WP:ORG. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions.  -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment There is a lack of reliable sources on the subject matter in English, that is for sure. I searched, including removing "in the United Kingdom" (all the results still had that in the body) but only found facebook, forums, etc.  Might need input from some people who speak Kazakh before making a final determination, however.  Dennis Brown (talk) 14:51, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

there is more information on the Companies house website about the society. its a non-profit organisation uniting kazakhs in the UK. Will include this link in the reference.
 * Comment Here is the Facebook link for the society http://www.facebook.com/kazsociety?sk=wall&filter=2

News and photo report from events:

http://www.khabar.kz/rus/culture/Prazdnik_Nauriz_otmechajut_v_Velikobritanii.html http://astana.nightout.ru/photoreportlight/8523 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ereke (talk • contribs) 14:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)  — Ereke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Note that I have had to remove almost the entire article as a copyvio as it just replicated material from the organisation's copyrighted web site.  Wikipedia is not a WP:WEBHOST. -- Whpq (talk) 16:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment The material used upon authorization of the organization.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ereke (talk • contribs) 19:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * You can't just say it is used with permission, there is a process, otherwise it is deleted. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * CommentWhat is the process? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.56.65 (talk) 14:09, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete blatantly fails WP:ORG. Facebook page hardly advances notability (in fact it doesn't). conflict of issue concerns with article creator. LibStar (talk) 07:52, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 12:41, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.