Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazan Secondary School № 18


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   00:08, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Kazan Secondary School № 18

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be promotional in nature, and a good-faith search for notability turned up nothing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 07:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Secondary schools are kept if they can be shown to exist. It's part of UNESCO's ASPNet. (same address) Clarityfiend (talk) 01:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * They aren't. The recent schools RFC reaffirmed that schools are not inherently notable. Rebb  ing  08:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Not what the RfD was about. It was merely about formalising the consensus; it didn't destroy the consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Thanks for finding that, Clarityfiend. It provides some notability. Information is difficult to find because much of it will be in Russian and search is difficult because of the various permutations of the name. I'm not sure "Kazan Secondary School № 18" is the best search string. In any case, local media is likely to have much more information than we can find. Jack N. Stock (talk) 23:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Searches need to be conducted in Russian and perhaps using different phrasing. However, it has been shown to exist and the sourcing shows some notability. AusLondonder (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.