Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazuaki Ogikubo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Kazuaki Ogikubo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unable to find coverage in any reliable sources to sufficiently establish notability of this Japanese conductor. J04n(talk page) 00:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 00:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 00:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: Unreferenced BLP Rescue was notified of this debate. J04n(talk page) 18:29, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I've added a link to the "Teaching Staff" short bio from the choir he formed (according to the ja.wikipedia article) as an external link. If he formed the choir, this probably doesn't count as an RS, unfortunately. I've not found any other RS.--Plad2 (talk) 09:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Not seeing any reliable third-party sourcing to confirm notability here. Article can always be recreated at a later date when or if fuller coverage becomes available. --DAJF (talk) 01:39, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, no sourcing from Japanese article either. --AerobicFox (talk) 06:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 *  Keep  Enough notable Rirunmot (talk) 11:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment If Ghit count is anything to go by, there is a good possibility that the subject may be notable; on the other hand, the bad news is that the top hit is the Japanese WP article, and many of the others are Youtube style videos. Can't understand any of those sources, so no vote from me, though I'd be inclined to vote delete if push came to shove. -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 15:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete admittedly it's tougher to guage notability on a conductor than it would be for a pop star, but in this case lack of notability is apparent in the lack of reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Long-term unreferenced BLP. No available sources, not even passing mentions. --Vassyana (talk) 14:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of reliable sources--possibly notable, but without reliable sources, we shouldn't have a BLP on it. Those voting keep are strongly encouraged to verify this conductor's putative notability through the addition of reliable sources to the article. -- j &#9883; e decker  talk  16:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.