Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazuhiko Aoki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Square Enix. J04n(talk page) 22:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Kazuhiko Aoki

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable WP:BLP without significant coverage from reliable, third-party sources Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:38, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - If coverage is not sufficient, it should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Topic had been a redirect for quite sometime before the article creator undid, and continued to do so, without discussion. No coverage on actual person himself, this is little more than a "credits section" for his work. Fails the WP:GNG. Sergecross73   msg me   17:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep – He has played a major role in co-creating several significant or well-known works, so passes WP:CREATIVE Bensci54 (talk) 21:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect back to Square Enix While he does appear to meet WP:CREATIVE #4, in the lead of that guideline it does say, " meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included ". The word not is also bolded on that page. When conducting WP:BEFORE, I was not able to find any reliable sources where he was the subject of the publication, and as such, does not assert enough notability in third party publications to warrant a standalone article. Mkdw talk 04:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.