Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazungul Saga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Kazungul Saga

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBOOK for lack of available sources. - MrX 12:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    14:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    14:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no sources to be found. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 17:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails the notability guideline for books. I can virtually not find a single decent source to add. Sam Sailor Talk! 02:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.