Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kbuuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Kbuuk

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-Notable ebook publisher. Has a few links but they seem to be press releases and merely trivial coverage or mentions. Hu12 (talk) 22:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did a search under just "Kbuuk" and was unable to find any in-depth coverage in reliable and secondary sources. Everything that I found were predominantly primary sources, nothing that would show notability. There's just no reason for this company to have an article, fails WP:CORP.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. 19:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 19:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete promotional piece. Lady  of  Shalott  03:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Tokyogirl79. The reliable third party sources just aren't there to support any notability for the company.  It is a fairly new company, so its possible they may garner some attention in the future, but at this point, they do not meet the requirements of notability. Rorshacma (talk) 17:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.