Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kea Ho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Don Ho.  MBisanz  talk 23:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Kea Ho

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod-reason was: Actress who falls under too soon with only one major film so far-which she was uncredited in. Now she does look like she will be notable someday-but not yet Wgolf (talk) 00:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

There are multiple citations for notable projects, many of which have already been released. Citations come from legitimate industry sources. What exactly are you basing your seemingly arbitrary decision on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hancocklane (talk • contribs) 00:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has very strict guidelines for notability. So far she has just been in one major film (Sin City 2), which was uncredited. Now she might be up and coming, but that falls under too soon. Eventually she might get her own page, but not yet. Wgolf (talk) 00:13, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Way WP:TOOSOON to satisfy WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:TOOSOON pretty much sums it up. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 21:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too soon at best. Not finding significant RS coverage to satisfy GNG. Fails WP:NACTOR with an uncredited role in a major film, low billing on a second film and a possibly significant role in an upcoming film. Even being the daughter of Don Ho doesn't get her much RS attention and notability is not inherited. • Gene93k (talk) 21:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete now and recreate later if she receives coverage when the upcoming film is released. At the moment, any coverage in reliable sources is trivial and isn't enough to pass WP:GNG. Wouldn't pass WP:ENT either. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as not at all independently notable. SwisterTwister   talk  07:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Don Ho. Seems absurd to toss the whole article, save the content and spin it out later if she gains significance.   Montanabw (talk)  18:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Don Ho. Content has been merged there, so this needs to be redirected. --Michig (talk) 06:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm only willing to go as far as Delete and Redirect'' but the thing about that is also us having the article vulnerable to restarting before she has any actual independent notability. I find it rather unlikely anyone would search for her and her career and be redirected to the father. Still questionable for her own article, whether the history is kept or not. SwisterTwister   talk  21:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.