Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kealin Ireland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. لenna vecia  15:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Kealin Ireland

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable local politician, who served on a local authority for 3 years from 2004-2007. Did notable during term of office or since. Fails WP:Politician Snappy (talk) 09:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  —Snappy (talk) 09:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  —Snappy (talk) 09:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Niteshift36 (talk) 11:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - #1. (The Irish Times) -- can  dle &bull; wicke  03:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * #2 (Sunday Tribune) -- can  dle &bull; wicke  03:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Her resignation received national attention in two separate sources. I know nothing about her but I found those two rather easily. I will continue my search. -- can  dle &bull; wicke  04:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * "Inaugural Meeting of Leitrim Branch of Birdwatch Ireland" - is this the same person? -- can  dle &bull; wicke  04:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Surely this is? -- can  dle &bull; wicke  04:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Interesting but only verifies the individual exists, which I am not disputing. Has she any political achievments to her credit apart from resigning? None of the sources met notability criteria, still fails WP:Politician and no evidence of notability in any other area, and that includes bird watching. Snappy (talk) 04:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: No doubt she exists. No doubt the occasional article has her name sppear in it. But what has she done to be come notable? Niteshift36 (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't deny that you are probably right. -- can  dle &bull; wicke  22:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Ok, so she has a name in the paper. Otherwise, I can't really see anything significant that would merit inclusion. Fuzbaby (talk) 01:55, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If she gets no coverage except for the event of retiring, she fails the one-event policy. Nyttend (talk) 19:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.