Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kearny fire department


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It is likely that a part of the article is copyvio, and it is safer in this case not to keep the edit history.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Kearny fire department

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet WP:GNG for an independent article. The appropriate information on the department is already present in Kearny, New Jersey so a separate article full of minutiae is unnecessary to the encyclopedia.  Imzadi 1979  →   00:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  01:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Delete or redirect to Kearny, New Jersey. CSD A10 also applies to the article.Iniciativass (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Individual fire departments are not notable unless they serve a large city or have something special about them.  Dough 48  72  05:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - There doesn't even appear to be local news coverage of the fire station. It isn't notable for anything in particular. The page also reads like a copy paste of excessive information. SPACKlick (talk) 12:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of independent notability for the fire department. Most of the text is cut and pasted from http://kearnyfire.com/html/history.html and whatever useful content exists there could be used as a source in the article for the municipality. The laundry lists of firefighters and fire equipment are probably unencyclopedic, even if an article for the department itself was justified. Alansohn (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kearny, New Jersey or delete. Either is acceptable.  Pretty obviously too trivial to satisfy the GNG. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Kearny, New Jersey, per above . Not notable enough to have own page. Tinton5 (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.