Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keats McFarland & Wilson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  22:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Keats McFarland & Wilson
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The only reason that this firm would be notable is because they (supposedly) assisted Yahoo! in a clickfraud lawsuit. That wouldn't have been very notable for that anyway. But even further than that, the only reference(s) they had for that were a forum and a blog (and the blog said nothing of the firm). So, non-notability is the thing here. flaminglawyerc 16:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability, nothing worth salvaging. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 17:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Arguable notability even if the claims were true, but the sources don't even guarantee that. – Alex43223T 08:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.