Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kedron State High School, Australia

NOTE: The version referred to in the debate below was deleted by its creator; I have now ensured that all work is original, and various notable facts of interest to a global audience have been included. --Brisvegas 00:49, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was - kept

Kedron State High School, Australia
Nominated for speedy, stated reason "this is not notable." That does not make it a candidate for speedy deletion, so I am listing it here. I have as yet no vote on this myself. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 21:49, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Yes that's true. I should have put it here instead. Can we remove the speedy notice and vote here instead? Thanks. Enochlau 21:52, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. This school is not-notable. The information about it really could apply to just about any other public school in Australia... Enochlau 21:53, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * see the latest edit - a user has removed text due to copyvio. Now the article is nothing more than a shell. Enochlau 10:22, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * will probably get removed due to copyvio now that the entire page has been taken off - there's not really much for us to discuss anymore really. Enochlau 00:01, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not notable, but at least it's properly named. Geogre 03:43, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Correction: nominated for speedy repeatedly. At any rate, sure, delete. Cool Hand Luke  01:03, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * For those not following... this article has a very strange history. Take a look at this revision. And has been blank for a good part of its editing life.


 * Keep it. The article is off to a good start but could use expansion.  &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 04:51, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * A copyright violation is not my idea of "a good start..." [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 12:45, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * If it's a copyvio, mark it as so. I saw no such disclaimer.  &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 20:33, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * A big chunk of it was copied directly from http://kedronshs.qld.edu.au/about/location.html. That portion was deleted by Cyrius, 19:04, 26 Nov 2004. I think you are right, even though this portion was removed, the article needs to be marked as a copyvio and deleted so that the copyright violation does not remain in the history. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 03:06, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. All public schools in Australia are notable. Dr Zen 07:59, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, Yet Another School. --fvw* 11:50, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
 * delete not notable. No, all schools are not notable for an international encylopedia, they are only locally notable - Drstuey 13:24, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Encyclopedic. - SimonP 17:34, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, yet another school. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 18:52, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, yet another deletion troll. Intrigue 23:10, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment -- the article has been marked as Copyvio. No longer a VfD item.  SWAdair | Talk  08:50, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.