Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kedushas Levi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  


 * The result was speedy keep. SlimVirgin (talk) 14:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Kedushas Levi
Non-notable. Google's top ten hits are Wikipedia or its mirrors. The article has no information about why such a text is in any way relevant or important. Should we have an article on every book now?  Páll  (Die pienk olifant) 07:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I think this doesn't appear to be historically notable. Any experts on the subject, however, would be greatly appreciated to advise whether this does conform to the usual Wikipedia standards of notability. --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 08:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep 1861 seems notable enough if it is still mentioned today. Needs expansion. Hopefully someone with knowledge on it can help. Arbusto 10:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Levi Yitzchok of Berditchev. Most of the information in this one-sentence article is already there, as is the image. David Sneek 14:15, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: 875 Ghits only.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.