Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keel (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:27, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Keel (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Non-notable software project. This search yields only 44 results, a lot of which relate to a single conference where the project was introduced. Removing that from the search yields only 13 results. Searching Google Scholar for the title of the original paper yields only 39 hits. So, fails WP:N andy (talk) 14:38, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * KEEL is useful for science and research --بايرام (talk) 16:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * But it doesn't mean it's notable. Delete.  Kubek15  write / sign 17:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Week keep. There are several scholar references (although many of them are from research work from the software's creators). On the negative side the software's site seems to be down (at least at the moment).Pxtreme75 (talk) 10:16, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.