Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keenan Beavis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that of the sources that exist, there aren't sufficient that are suitably reliable, independent and in-depth to show notability.

Should new, good, sources come into being in the future I will be happy to draftify when shown them Nosebagbear (talk) 08:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Keenan Beavis

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

BLP does not seem to meet WP:NBUSINESSPERSON, WP:NATHLETE or WP:NARTIST. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and British Columbia. Shellwood (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per norm. --Vaco98 (talk) 11:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The article appears to meet the general inclusion threshold of at least two substantive coverage pieces as the subject has been featured in topics related to notable awards as well as for athletic and business success. ViolinDebbie1972 (talk) 22:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The article provides reliable, independent of the subject sources and the subject has been featured in topics related to notable awards as well as for athletic and business success. General notability guidelines appear to be met. ViolinDebbie1972 (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * GNG requires media coverage, which one of those two links isn't, and even if we overlooked the fact that the Métis Nation British Columbia isn't media we would still require more than just two hits of media coverage anyway. An award isn't automatically a notability claim just because you can source it to the awarding organization's own self-published press releases about itself — for any award to constitute a notability claim, it has to be demonstrated that the award itself is a notable one, by virtue of being an award whose presentations get reported as news in media, and an award is not notable enough to make its winners notable for winning it if you can't show that the award gets media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

At a minimum, this article should be considered to be moved to the sandbox as it appears the subject is somewhat notable in the Indigenous community and the trajectory of new sources appears to be climbing. OneEyeball (talk) 21:48, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The "notable" awards aren't notable. Provincial entrepreneur for media is hardly a Gemini Award. He's basically a really smart guy that's good at jiu-jitsu. Most sources found are press releases. Forbes and the Globe and Mail articles are advertorials. I get 8 hits in GNews, 2 of wich aren't notable as just discussed. Rest are in passing or press-releases. Vanity spam Oaktree b (talk)
 * Delete. The article is based far, far too heavily on primary sources and blogs that are not support for notability, and states absolutely nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on much better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.