Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keep On Dancin'


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deleted. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 22:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep On Dancin'
"Keep on dancin'" surrey gets several hundred GHits, but can't find anything actually relevant. Almost certainly fails WP:NOT, likely unverifiable and OR, article created by user with history of nothing but vandalism (mostly to a school article). Suspect strong case for speedy, but couldn't quite fit it in with defined CSD points so throwing it open to debate. ~ Matticus78 21:55, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Obvious NFT. Fan1967 22:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:MEME Danny Lilithborne 22:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT and WP:MEME. SM247 My Talk  00:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I wasn't aware of some of the guidelines, and the article doesn't fit into them. Spademan 12.37, 2nd July 2006
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.