Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Captive orcas.  MBisanz  talk 23:39, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Keet

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

lacks notability, reliable 3rd party sources. Appears to include original research Rtphokie (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Agree. Delete & redirect to section in Captive orcas Aymatth2 (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 13:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect into SeaWorld San Antonio Captive orcas - we don't have articles on individual animals in individual zoos and parks, unless there is a really good reason for it. Knut (polar bear) is a good example on the kind of media coverage that would be required for a zoo animal to be notable of its own article. Note also the similar AfD for Kayla - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 14:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Captive orcas Edward321 (talk) 14:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge Somewhere Else and Redirect. I am noting the bold merge on Captive orcas. This made the article 61 KB long in violation of the WP:SIZE Guideline however based on my test edits of the page at my sandbox. The test edits after removing the whale list from the article brought the size down to just over 19 KB. The article I would suggest the list be moved to is List of Captive orcas however the split article would be at least 41 KB long (about 8 KB above the Guideline So we may need to split into more articles).  Sawblade05  (talk to me undefined my wiki life) 04:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * See comment on Talk:Captive orcas. Suggest we continue merge, then discuss best way to split. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.