Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kegabyte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Kegabyte

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article subject is either a WP:HOAX or not notable. While my specialism lies in this area i have never heard of a "Kegabyte", and not does altavista which return 46 results Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 22:53, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete par being the nominator Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 22:53, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no iPods that can hold a kegabyte, so they do not exist. Stijndon (talk) 22:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Is this how members of a fraternity measure RAM? No, seriously, there are no reliable sources; WP:NEO. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Why was this nonsense not simply speedied?? --Crusio (talk) 23:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V and WP:RS. This reeks of WP:BOLLOCKS.  Cliff smith  talk  23:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the reasons already given. It's also my specialism and a term I've never heard of. Dpmuk (talk) 00:44, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V and WP:RS --  Darth Mike   ( Talk  • Contribs ) 01:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --Kisholi (talk) 01:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete strange to IT-related professionals and fails WP:V. --RekishiEJ (talk) 15:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.