Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kegel Male Trainer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Kegel Male Trainer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant spamvertising for a product that promises to make your dick harder, for longer. You know, "as seen on tv." Problem, no reliable independent sources cover this dubious product. I would like this to be speedy but the article asserts notability; it was written, apparently by a for-hire wikipedia article writer/promoter. A review of his prose will make it clear why he couldn't get a reputable writing gig. Bali ultimate (talk) 18:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to note that it appears this article was recreated out of process by the paid article writer per [?title=Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2009-04-26/Kegel_male_trainer&oldid=286251852]. Date on that is april 26 complaining of the articles deletion. This current version was created by the same paid editor on May 24. So i think this should be a speedy now is a recreation out of process (unless there was a DRV I'm unaware of). Bali ultimate (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete -- No reliable independent media coverage. See also these other promotional articles: Al Dana, Security Footwear and Liz Glazowski as well as User talk:Petrosianii, User talk:Smkovalinsky and Articles for deletion/Al Dana. -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Also may be related to User:Youhavealan and Braun Mincher (another paid-to-edit article?). See this [?title=User:Petrosianii/sandbox&oldid=292471571 re-write] currently in progress.-- A. B. (talk • contribs) 16:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No media coverage indeed. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:10, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Product is not notable and primary author is a paid contributor. Plastikspork (talk) 23:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Billy Mays here with another fine Delete vote from Wikipedia! WP:COI issues and this sounds like complete snake oil.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC) ( who is not really Billy Mays; some restrictions apply, just pay shipping and processing )
 * Speedy delete - not all inventions are notable, and this is paid spam by a known spammer. Bearian (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.