Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kegg Pipe Organ Builders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 16:25, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Kegg Pipe Organ Builders

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I've just declined an A7 request on this, mainly due to the fact that it's been up for two years without anyone raising any complaint. Although it's unreferenced, I have absolutely no idea if this is a notable company in the pipe-organ world — and I'm not even sure how I'd find out, since I'd imagine most coverage would be in the specialist musical and religious press which wouldn't necessarily make it online. This, bringing it over here for some kind of consensus, as at the moment it doesn't quite meet inclusion rules, but I'm loath to delete it if it's a major company in its field. This is a procedural nom so I abstain. —  iride  scent  23:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added references from three different newspapers. --Eastmain (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Comes up near the top of Google List, they sell organs across the country and built the largest one in northern California. As much, if not more, notable than other pipe organ builders on here.  §hep   •   ¡Talk to me!  01:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, the company appears to be notable within its niche field of pipe organ building.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  17:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Exactly how does this meet WP:CORP? Vegaswikian (talk) 17:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources. i.e. The Times-Standard, Eureka, California, Akron Beacon Journal, and The Cincinnati Post. §hep   •   ¡Talk to me!  20:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.