Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keighley and district service 760


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Petros471 12:12, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Keighley and district service 760
This seems a pointless and hardly useful page, why is this single bus service given its own entry out of the thousands operated through the United Kingdom? Esp as there isn't even an entry yet for the route operator Keighley & District. Achmelvic 13:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT - indiscriminate collection of information Tom Harrison Talk 14:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this seems like the epitome of a big lump of indiscriminate information. --Kuzaar-T-C- 14:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -999 (Talk) 19:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Transportcruft? Buscruft? Any, Wiki is not an indiscriminate collection of random pointless info like this. doktorb | words 20:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.