Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith B. Dixon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 10:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Keith B. Dixon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Some notability exists, but mostly it fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Also, by the tone and grammar of the article, it looks quite self promotional. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, seems wholly promotional and inappropriately written, clearly an advert for Dixon and his photography business. If there are any claims to notability, I can't see them (or find any online). Sionk (talk) 23:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a place for promotional articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:57, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a promo, not an encyclopedic article. Lepricavark (talk) 18:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 08:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.