Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Berman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:59, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Keith Berman
Non-notable individual, largely self-aggrandizing. RPIRED 00:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC) Portal to two important non-profits:
 * Delete. Wikipedia isn't a CV database or a place to promote one's business. Brian G. Crawford 00:56, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as A7 for unnotable. --Mmx1 00:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy A7, doesn't seem notable. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 01:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete --MacRusgail 01:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * "Do not delete."" This site links non-profit organizations at Harvard University to educational programs (Crimson Summer Academy), and has implications for national research (Harvard CAC). Information is factual, nearly devoid of adjectives (the stuff of "self-aggrandizing").  Not notably different from profiles of American businesspeople, educators. Signed -- deusyali
 * Delete not notable. Bucketsofg 01:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails per WP:BIO. Also, the person is only notable in an article being listed for deletion. -- Jay  (Reply)  01:11, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable; fails WP:BIO; 212 unique Google results -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 01:32, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO. Not a speedy in my opinion, as president of organization is a claim to notability; just not one that is likely to gain consensus.  Editor "deusyali" is advised that the purpose of a WP biographical article is not to serve as a portal to non-profit orgs whether notable or not.  If evidence of notability is shown for this individual, article will need cleanup of non-encyclopedic resume material.  Lacking such evidence, the article need not be kept.  Barno 01:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * User is advised that deleting other editors' AfD comments and votes (which happened while I was editing my previous entry) is against WP policy and is more likely to hurt your case than to help it. Comment added (while deleting others) follows; note similarity to deusyali's words.  Barno 01:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Do not delete:
 * Crimson Summer Academy
 * Harvard CAC

Language is factual, few adjectives. Very similar to boilerplate language in American businessmen category.
 * Delete as per all, and just like the last nom. --Deville (Talk) 02:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete there are portals for this, and it's of very specific, local nature, rather than encyclopedic Evillan 04:24, 28 March 2006 (UTC).
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. --Ter e nce Ong 10:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all --Ugur Basak 21:35, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.